Government measurements, denominators attached

The problem is measured. The limits stay visible.

A historical study is not today's prevalence. A complaint is not a confirmed error. A simulation is not an observed correction. Open each receipt before trusting the number.

Start your free audit

Three government measurements

1 in 5

FTC national accuracy study · 2012

Participants identifying an error on at least one report

In the FTC's 2012 study, one in five of 1,001 participants identified an error on at least one of their 2,968 credit reports; five percent had errors the study said could lead to less favorable loan terms.

Historical study result

Open source receipt and limitations
Year
2012 study; FTC release published 2013
Population
U.S. consumers in the congressionally mandated national study and their reports from the three nationwide credit reporting companies
Numerator
Participants identifying at least one error; one in five. Separate consequential cut: five percent of participants.
Denominator
1,001 participants; 2,968 reports reviewed. The reported rates use participants, not reports, as the denominator.
Measured event
Participant-identified error on at least one report; separate error that could lead to less favorable loan terms
Limitation
Historical study result, not a 2026 prevalence estimate and not a prediction of what VetMyCredit will find. Identified error, report modification, correction, score change, and legal violation are not interchangeable.
Stale state
HISTORICAL. Never relabel as current prevalence. Recheck primary-source availability by 2027-08-01; if inaccessible, label the link stale without changing the historical result.
Source capture
S71 in the 2026-08-01 sources appendix, SHA-256 3f3df13a…c64d9ab
Copy hash
563c8f732bbe16ca58ac553f2832118360957734a315c804c7f0b0100878acf7

5.8M

CFPB complaint volume · 2025

Credit or consumer reporting complaint events

The CFPB received 6,635,400 complaints in 2025; approximately 5,806,800, or 88 percent, concerned credit or consumer reporting.

Current for named 2025 report

Open source receipt and limitations
Year
2025 complaint events; annual report published March 2026
Population
Complaints received by the CFPB in 2025
Numerator
Approximately 5,806,800 credit or consumer reporting complaints
Denominator
6,635,400 total CFPB complaints
Measured event
Complaint received and categorized as credit or consumer reporting; reported share rounded to 88 percent
Limitation
Complaint volume is not unique consumers, confirmed errors, or adjudicated violations. One submission can concern multiple companies, and third-party activity and repeat use affect volume.
Stale state
CURRENT FOR NAMED YEAR. Recheck when the 2026 annual report publishes or by 2027-04-01, whichever comes first. After that trigger, mark stale until re-receipted.
Source capture
S73 in the 2026-08-01 sources appendix, SHA-256 3f3df13a…c64d9ab
Copy hash
b26486c0caf97e87a53002e9bd827a71eb2c79dd3a22ca2a12879a4d874f425d

33.0%

Federal Reserve simulation · 2004 Bulletin

Individuals affected by modeled missing credit-limit data

In the Federal Reserve's 2004 Bulletin simulation, 33.0 percent of individuals in the relevant simulation sample were affected by the modeled failure to report a credit limit.

Historical simulation result

Open source receipt and limitations
Year
June 30, 2003 file sample; analysis published Summer 2004
Population
Individuals in the relevant simulation sample drawn from a nationally representative random sample of credit files
Numerator
Individuals affected by the simulated failure to report a credit limit; absolute count is not stated in Table 3
Denominator
Individuals in that simulation sample; absolute count is not stated in Table 3. The reported share is 33.0 percent.
Measured event
Inclusion in a modeled correction for failure to report a credit limit, not observation of an adjudicated error
Limitation
The authors did not observe every actual error, the proper correction was sometimes unclear, only selected data problems were modeled, and results depended on an approximation of a proprietary scoring model. This is not a current prevalence estimate.
Stale state
HISTORICAL. Never relabel as current prevalence or a current scoring-system specification. Recheck primary-source availability by 2027-08-01.
Source capture
S76 in the 2026-08-01 sources appendix, SHA-256 3f3df13a…c64d9ab; Table 3 source text rechecked 2026-08-01
Copy hash
0547578d0c6015c0e5788e5bc7e3e9b93d9b343cb49ac3109f169e33bbe7fe4b

The stale-state rule

Every measurement is labeled current for a named period, historical, or stale. A newer official release, a missed review date, or a changed source marks a current claim stale before it can be reused. Historical evidence stays historical; age never turns it into a current prevalence claim.

Government data describes a system. Your audit still starts with your line and your evidence.

Start your free audit